LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-36292: WordPress Gallery PhotoBlocks plugin <= 1.2.6 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WPChill Gallery PhotoBlocks plugin <= 1.2.6 at WordPress.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-36292 affects the WPChill Gallery PhotoBlocks WordPress plugin through version 1.2.6. It is a CSRF issue, meaning an attacker may be able to trick a logged-in user into causing unwanted plugin actions. The published severity is medium because user interaction is required and the reported impact is limited to integrity and availability.

Executive priority

Handle this as a routine but real WordPress hygiene item. It is not presented as actively exploited, but exposed sites should remediate because CSRF can cause unauthorized changes when trusted users are tricked into interacting with attacker-controlled content.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-352 in Gallery PhotoBlocks <= 1.2.6. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L, indicating network reachability, low attack complexity, required user interaction, no confidentiality impact, and low integrity and availability impact. The source bundle does not name vulnerable endpoints or a fixed version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with the WPChill Gallery PhotoBlocks plugin installed at version 1.2.6 or earlier. Sites without this plugin, or running a vendor-confirmed non-affected version, are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. Practical risk depends on whether an attacker can induce a logged-in WordPress user to interact with malicious content and on the privileges of that user.

Researcher notes

Available evidence identifies the weakness class, affected plugin, affected version range, and CVSS vector, but not endpoint-level details, exploit maturity, or a named fixed release. Avoid assuming affected actions or roles beyond what the vendor-linked CVE sources state.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Gallery PhotoBlocks or photoblocks-grid-gallery.
  • Check vendor and WordPress plugin guidance for a fixed version.
  • Upgrade if a vendor-confirmed fixed release is available.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if no maintained fixed release is available.
  • Prioritize sites where privileged users commonly stay logged in.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the plugin is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and flag versions <= 1.2.6.
  • Verify remediation leaves no affected plugin version active.
  • Review recent plugin-related configuration changes for unexpected activity.
  • Track Patchstack and WordPress plugin pages for updated vendor guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-36292 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-36292Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
WPChillGallery PhotoBlocks (WordPress plugin)<= 1.2.6Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.