LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-3267: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ikus060/rdiffweb

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.6.

MediumCVSS 6.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-3267 is a CSRF flaw in ikus060/rdiffweb before version 2.4.6. If abused, a user’s browser could be made to send unintended requests to rdiffweb. The CVSS score is medium, but the confidentiality impact is marked high, so exposed installations should be upgraded promptly.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation during the next normal vulnerability cycle, sooner for externally reachable or sensitive backup management environments. This is not confirmed actively exploited, but backup interfaces can expose sensitive operational data.

Technical view

The record identifies CWE-352 in the ikus060/rdiffweb GitHub repository prior to 2.4.6. The CVSS 3.0 vector is AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L, indicating required user interaction, low attack complexity, and potential confidentiality impact. No CPEs or detailed affected version ranges are provided.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running rdiffweb before 2.4.6. Public sources do not identify broader downstream products, hosted services, OS packages, or CPE matches. Internet-facing or broadly reachable rdiffweb deployments carry higher practical risk.

Exploitation context

The provided bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. The weakness class implies browser-mediated abuse of a user session, but the sources do not provide confirmed exploitation, exploit maturity, or incident reporting.

Researcher notes

The source bundle is sparse: it gives the affected project, CWE, fixed-version boundary, CVSS vector, huntr report, and GitHub commit. It does not provide detailed endpoint scope, exploit status, package metadata, or vendor advisory text beyond the references.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade rdiffweb to version 2.4.6 or later.
  • Check vendor release notes and commit history for complete remediation guidance.
  • Restrict rdiffweb access to trusted networks and authenticated users.
  • Review session and CSRF protection settings after upgrading.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all rdiffweb deployments and record running versions.
  • Confirm no deployment remains below version 2.4.6.
  • Review application logs for unusual state-changing requests tied to user sessions.
  • Verify administrative workflows still require intended user actions after remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-3267 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.8CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L2.14.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.8Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2022-3267Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ikus060ikus060/rdiffwebunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.