LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-3233: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ikus060/rdiffweb

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.6.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Rdiffweb versions before 2.4.6 had a CSRF weakness that could let an attacker trick a user into causing an unintended state-changing action. The CVSS impact is limited to low integrity impact, with no stated confidentiality or availability impact.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority hygiene fix. It is not documented as actively exploited, but it affects integrity and can be triggered remotely with user interaction, so exposed or business-critical deployments should be updated promptly.

Technical view

CVE-2022-3233 is CWE-352 in ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.6. The CVSS 3.0 score is 4.3, with network attack vector, low complexity, no attacker privileges, required user interaction, unchanged scope, and low integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to deployments of ikus060/rdiffweb before 2.4.6. The source bundle does not provide CPEs, package ecosystem metadata, or a detailed affected-version range beyond “prior to 2.4.6.”

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires user interaction, consistent with CSRF risk, but the provided sources should be consulted for exact affected behavior.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sufficient for product, weakness class, CVSS, and fixed-version threshold. It is incomplete for precise vulnerable endpoints, exploit prevalence, and environmental prerequisites. Avoid assuming broader products or active attacks from this bundle alone.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade rdiffweb to version 2.4.6 or later.
  • Review the linked vendor commit for the implemented CSRF-related change.
  • Check vendor release notes or advisories for any additional hardening guidance.
  • Prioritize internet-accessible or multi-user rdiffweb deployments.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all rdiffweb deployments and record installed versions.
  • Confirm no deployment is running a version before 2.4.6.
  • Review application routes for CSRF protections on state-changing requests.
  • Verify remediation through standard application regression testing.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-3233 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2022-3233Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ikus060ikus060/rdiffwebunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.