LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-3226: An OS command injection vulnerability allows admins to execute code via SSL VPN configuration uploads in So...

An OS command injection vulnerability allows admins to execute code via SSL VPN configuration uploads in Sophos Firewall releases older than version 19.5 GA.

HighCVSS 7.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-3226 lets someone with Sophos Firewall administrator access abuse SSL VPN configuration uploads to run operating system commands on older firewall releases. The business risk is full firewall compromise after admin access is obtained. The provided sources do not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority firewall hygiene issue. Patch or replace older Sophos Firewall releases promptly, but prioritize alongside admin-access hardening because exploitation requires administrator privileges.

Technical view

This is a CWE-78 OS command injection issue in Sophos Firewall releases older than 19.5 GA. CVSS 3.1 is 7.2: network reachable, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations using Sophos Firewall versions older than 19.5 GA are the likely exposed population, especially where admin access is broadly available or weakly controlled.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability requires administrator privileges. The source bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of in-the-wild exploitation or public exploit availability.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE record and Sophos advisory reference. The key constraints are older-than-19.5-GA Sophos Firewall, SSL VPN configuration uploads, CWE-78, and PR:H. No exploit telemetry is cited.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Sophos Firewall systems to version 19.5 GA or later.
  • Review the Sophos advisory for any additional vendor guidance.
  • Restrict firewall administration to trusted networks and named administrators.
  • Remove unnecessary administrator accounts and enforce strong authentication.
  • Monitor Sophos advisories for updates affecting this CVE.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Sophos Firewall deployments and record installed versions.
  • Confirm no production firewall is older than 19.5 GA.
  • Review admin accounts and SSL VPN configuration upload activity.
  • Check firewall audit logs for unexpected administrative changes.
  • Verify management access is limited to approved sources.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-3226 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.25.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.2High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-3226Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SophosSophos Firewallunspecified, unspecified, unspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.