Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This is a low-severity CSRF issue in the Solidus e-commerce admin interface. In affected versions, an attacker who knows an order number could cause an administrator’s browser to finalize or unfinalize that order’s adjustments. The business impact is limited to order-adjustment integrity, but stores using affected Solidus Backend versions should patch.
Executive priority
Handle through normal patch management unless the Solidus admin interface is broadly exposed or order-adjustment integrity is business-critical. The vulnerability is low severity, but the fix is clear and vendor-provided.
Technical view
CVE-2022-31000 is CWE-352 in solidus_backend before 3.1.6, 3.0.6, and 2.11.16. It allows changing the state of an order’s adjustments when the attacker has the order number and execution occurs on a store administrator’s computer. CVSS is 2.3, integrity impact low.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to Solidus stores running vulnerable solidus_backend versions: below 2.11.16, 3.0.0 to below 3.0.6, or 3.1.0 to below 3.1.6. Risk is higher where administrators stay logged in and the admin interface is reachable.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The described attack requires an affected Solidus Backend deployment, knowledge of an order number, and execution in the context of a store administrator’s computer.
Researcher notes
Keep scope narrow: sources support CSRF affecting order adjustment finalize/unfinalize state only. They do not establish broader order modification, data exposure, availability impact, or active exploitation. Use the vendor advisory and patch commit as primary references.
Mitigation direction
- Upgrade solidus_backend to 3.1.6, 3.0.6, or 2.11.16 as applicable.
- Restrict access to the Solidus admin interface to trusted networks or authenticated paths.
- Review vendor guidance before applying any workaround not named in the advisory.
- Monitor order adjustment state changes for unexpected finalize or unfinalize activity.
Validation and detection
- Check dependency manifests for the installed solidus_backend version.
- Confirm production and staging stores are not on affected version ranges.
- Review admin access paths and session exposure for Solidus Backend.
- Audit recent order adjustment state changes for unexplained activity.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2022-31000 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Low
- CVSS
- 2.3 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N0.81.4Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
2.3LowVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/solidusio/solidus/security/advisories/GHSA-8639-qx56-r428CVE reference · x_refsource_CONFIRM
- https://github.com/solidusio/solidus/commit/de796a2e0be7f154cae48b46e267501559d9716cCVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.