LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-30662: Adobe InDesign Font Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Adobe InDesign versions 17.2.1 (and earlier) and 16.4.1 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability can let a malicious InDesign file run code as the person who opens it. The user must interact with the file, so exposure is concentrated among staff who handle outside design assets, client files, or email attachments in Adobe InDesign.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for teams using InDesign with external files. It is not described as actively exploited in the provided sources, but the potential impact is full compromise of the user's workstation context.

Technical view

CVE-2022-30662 is a CWE-787 out-of-bounds write in Adobe InDesign font parsing. Affected versions are InDesign 17.2.1 and earlier and 16.4.1 and earlier. Successful exploitation may allow arbitrary code execution in the current user's context. CVSS 3.0 score is 7.8 high.

Likely exposure

Organizations are exposed where Adobe InDesign 17.2.1 or earlier, or 16.4.1 or earlier, remains installed. Highest practical risk is on creative, marketing, publishing, and production endpoints that open external or untrusted InDesign-related files.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Exploitation requires user interaction: the victim must open a malicious file. The impact is serious because code can run with the current user's privileges.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports high severity, user-assisted file exploitation, and arbitrary code execution. The bundle identifies affected version ceilings but does not include detailed fixed-version text, exploit indicators, or public exploitation claims.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply Adobe APSB22-30 guidance for affected InDesign installations.
  • Prioritize remediation on systems that open external design files.
  • Restrict opening unsolicited InDesign files until remediation is confirmed.
  • Use endpoint controls to limit damage from user-context code execution.
  • Check vendor guidance if fixed-version details are needed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Adobe InDesign installations and exact versions.
  • Compare versions against 17.2.1 and earlier, and 16.4.1 and earlier.
  • Identify users who receive external design files or attachments.
  • Confirm APSB22-30 remediation is applied on affected endpoints.
  • Review security telemetry for suspicious activity after file opens.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-787: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-30662 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2022-30662Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
AdobeInDesignunspecified, unspecified, unspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-787 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Write

Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.