LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-30337: WordPress WP Meta SEO plugin <= 4.4.8 - Social Settings Update vis Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JoomUnited WP Meta SEO plugin <= 4.4.8 at WordPress allows an attacker to update the social settings.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-30337 affects the JoomUnited WP Meta SEO WordPress plugin through version 4.4.8. It is a CSRF flaw that could let an attacker change the plugin's social settings if a targeted user is tricked into taking an action. Business impact is mainly unauthorized site configuration changes, reputation risk, and possible disruption to social sharing behavior.

Executive priority

Handle as a routine but timely WordPress plugin remediation. It is not supported as actively exploited in the provided evidence, but exposed public sites should not leave configuration-changing CSRF flaws unaddressed.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery in WP Meta SEO social settings update functionality. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.4, with network attack vector, low complexity, no attacker privileges, required user interaction, and low integrity and availability impact. Public source data identifies affected versions as <= 4.4.8.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites with JoomUnited WP Meta SEO installed at version 4.4.8 or earlier. The bundle does not specify affected roles, fixed version details, or whether hosted managed WordPress environments are differently exposed.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle, and the cited sources do not state active exploitation. Attack feasibility depends on user interaction and a site running the vulnerable plugin version. No exploit steps are provided here.

Researcher notes

Evidence is concise: public records identify the plugin, affected version range, weakness class, CVSS vector, and impacted social settings. The bundle does not include proof-of-concept details, fixed-version confirmation, or role-specific preconditions, so validation should focus on version exposure and vendor advisory review.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for WP Meta SEO version 4.4.8 or earlier.
  • Check JoomUnited, WordPress.org, and Patchstack guidance for the fixed upgrade path.
  • Upgrade the plugin when vendor guidance identifies a safe fixed version.
  • Restrict WordPress administrative access to trusted users.
  • Review recent WP Meta SEO social settings for unauthorized changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether WP Meta SEO is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare it with <= 4.4.8 exposure.
  • Review administrative activity around social settings changes.
  • Verify vendor guidance before marking the finding remediated.
  • Retest after upgrade to confirm the vulnerable version is no longer present.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-30337 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-30337Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
JoomUnitedWP Meta SEO (WordPress plugin)<= 4.4.8Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.