LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-3025: Bitcoin / Altcoin Faucet <= 1.6.0 - Settings Update to Stored XSS via CSRF

The Bitcoin / Altcoin Faucet WordPress plugin through 1.6.0 does not have any CSRF check when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping, it could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue affects the Bitcoin / Altcoin Faucet WordPress plugin through 1.6.0. A logged-in administrator could be tricked into saving malicious settings, and those settings may persist as stored cross-site scripting. Business impact is mainly website integrity, admin trust, and potential visitor/admin data exposure.

Executive priority

Handle as a moderate website integrity risk. Prioritize remediation where the plugin is installed on public or revenue-related sites, but do not treat it as confirmed exploited based on the provided sources.

Technical view

The sources describe missing CSRF protection on settings updates plus inadequate sanitization and escaping. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.4, with network access, low complexity, required privileges, required user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality/integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running Bitcoin / Altcoin Faucet through version 1.6.0, especially where administrators are active in the dashboard. The bundle does not identify affected CPEs or hosting-specific exposure details.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not report active exploitation, and KEV status is false. Abuse requires a logged-in administrator to interact with attacker-controlled content or a trigger path that causes a settings change.

Researcher notes

Evidence is concise and centered on WPScan/CVE descriptions. No proof-of-concept details, patch version, or exploitation telemetry are provided in the bundle. Avoid assuming broader altcoin faucet products are affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Bitcoin / Altcoin Faucet through 1.6.0.
  • Check vendor, WordPress plugin, or WPScan guidance for a fixed or safe version.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if no trusted fixed version is available.
  • Restrict administrator access to necessary users only.
  • Review faucet plugin settings for unexpected HTML or script content.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the plugin is installed and record its exact version.
  • Review admin audit trails for recent plugin settings changes.
  • Inspect plugin-rendered pages for unexpected stored script content.
  • Verify any remediation against current vendor or WPScan guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-3025 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.32.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-3025Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
UnknownBitcoin / Altcoin Faucet1.6.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.