LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-3024: Simple Bitcoin Faucets <= 1.7.0 - Unauthorised AJAX Call to Stored XSS

The Simple Bitcoin Faucets WordPress plugin through 1.7.0 does not have any authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscribers to call it and add/delete/edit Bonds. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping, it could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-3024 affects the Simple Bitcoin Faucets WordPress plugin through 1.7.0. A low-privileged logged-in user, such as a subscriber, may be able to change plugin Bonds and introduce stored cross-site scripting. Business risk is highest on WordPress sites allowing untrusted user accounts.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority web application issue. Prioritize internet-facing WordPress sites with open registration, customer accounts, or high brand risk from stored XSS.

Technical view

The issue combines missing authorization, missing CSRF protection, and insufficient sanitization/escaping in a plugin AJAX action. The published CVSS is 5.4, with network access, low complexity, low privileges, required user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites running the affected plugin through version 1.7.0, especially where subscriber or other low-privilege accounts are available to untrusted users.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation is described as requiring an authenticated low-privilege user and user interaction for XSS impact.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description and WPScan reference in the bundle. No patched version, exploit activity, or detailed remediation is provided, so avoid assuming fix availability without checking current vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the affected plugin and version.
  • Check WPScan and vendor guidance for fixed versions or official mitigation.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if it is not business-critical.
  • Restrict untrusted user registration and low-privilege account access.
  • Review plugin-managed Bonds for unexpected content changes or scripts.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the plugin is installed and at or below 1.7.0.
  • Review whether subscriber accounts are available to untrusted users.
  • Inspect plugin data for unauthorized Bond additions, edits, or deletions.
  • Check security logs for suspicious authenticated AJAX activity.
  • Verify remediation against current vendor or WPScan guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-863: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-3024 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.32.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-3024Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
UnknownBitcoin Satoshi Tools : Faucets, Visitor Rewarder, Satoshi Games, Referral Program1.7.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-863 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Authorization

Incorrect Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.