Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2022-30175 is a high-severity remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Azure RTOS GUIX Studio 6.0.0.0. The scoring indicates an attacker needs local access and user interaction, so risk is highest on developer systems where GUIX Studio is installed and users handle untrusted files or project content.
Executive priority
Treat as a focused high-priority developer-tool risk, not a broad internet-facing emergency based on the supplied evidence. Prioritize asset discovery and vendor-guided remediation on systems that build or maintain embedded GUI projects.
Technical view
The issue is classified as CWE-94, code injection, affecting Azure RTOS GUIX Studio 6.0.0.0. CVSS 3.1 is 7.8 with local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to systems running Azure RTOS GUIX Studio 6.0.0.0, especially developer workstations or build environments. The provided sources do not identify broader Azure RTOS runtime exposure or other affected versions.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The CVSS temporal metric includes proof-of-concept maturity, but no cited source here confirms real-world exploitation.
Researcher notes
Key constraints are local attack vector and required user interaction. The vendor title says remote code execution, but the CVSS vector does not indicate network-reachable exploitation. Evidence is insufficient to assert active exploitation or affected versions beyond 6.0.0.0.
Mitigation direction
- Identify and prioritize systems running Azure RTOS GUIX Studio 6.0.0.0.
- Review Microsoft MSRC guidance for the vendor-supported update or mitigation.
- Restrict use of untrusted GUIX Studio files or projects until remediated.
- Remove unused installations from developer and build systems.
Validation and detection
- Inventory installed Azure RTOS GUIX Studio versions across endpoints.
- Confirm whether version 6.0.0.0 is present.
- Verify remediation status against the Microsoft MSRC advisory.
- Check endpoint controls for handling untrusted project content.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2022-30175 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C1.85.9Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.8HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityCVE reference · vendor-advisory
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.