LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-29492: A vulnerability exists in the handling of a malformed IEC 104 TCP packet. Upon receiving a malformed IEC 104 TCP packet, the malformed packet is dropped, however the TCP connection is left open. This may cause a denial-of-service if the affected conne ...

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the handling of a malformed IEC 104 TCP packet in the Hitachi Energy MicroSCADA X SYS600, MicroSCADA Pro SYS600. Upon receiving a malformed IEC 104 TCP packet, the malformed packet is dropped, however the TCP connection is left open. This may cause a denial-of-service if the affected connection is left open. This issue affects: Hitachi Energy MicroSCADA Pro SYS600 version 9.4 FP2 Hotfix 4 and earlier versions Hitachi Energy MicroSCADA X SYS600 version 10 to version 10.3.1. cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_pro_sys600:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_pro_sys600:9.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_pro_sys600:9.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_pro_sys600:9.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_pro_sys600:9.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-29492 can let a network attacker disrupt affected Hitachi Energy MicroSCADA SYS600 systems by leaving TCP connections open after malformed IEC 104 traffic is received. The known impact is availability loss, not data theft or code execution.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate OT availability risk. Prioritize sites where affected MicroSCADA systems support critical operations or where IEC 104 TCP paths are not tightly segmented.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-20 improper input validation in IEC 104 TCP packet handling. A malformed packet is dropped, but the TCP connection remains open, which may cause denial of service. CVSS 3.1 is 5.3 with network access, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and low availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Hitachi Energy MicroSCADA Pro SYS600 9.4 FP2 Hotfix 4 and earlier, and MicroSCADA X SYS600 versions 10 through 10.3.1, especially where IEC 104 TCP access is reachable.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not cite active exploitation, and KEV is false. The CVSS vector indicates remote network reachability and no authentication requirement, but the documented impact is denial of service through connection handling.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description, CVSS data, affected version ranges, and vendor reference. No exploit proof, patch detail, or active exploitation evidence is included in the provided bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the Hitachi Energy advisory for approved fixed versions or mitigations.
  • Prioritize remediation for internet-reachable or broadly reachable IEC 104 TCP services.
  • Restrict IEC 104 TCP access to trusted operational networks where feasible.
  • Monitor affected systems for abnormal long-lived or accumulating TCP connections.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory MicroSCADA Pro SYS600 and MicroSCADA X SYS600 versions.
  • Confirm whether affected systems expose IEC 104 TCP services.
  • Compare installed versions against the affected version ranges in the advisory.
  • Review operational telemetry for resource pressure or stale open connections.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-29492 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-29492Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Hitachi EnergyMicroSCADA X SYS60010, 10.1, 10.1.1, 10.2, 10.2.1, 10.3, 10.3.1Listed
Hitachi EnergyMicroSCADA Pro SYS600unspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.