Security readout for executives and security teams
libcurl could reuse an existing connection after security-related TLS or SSH options changed. That could make a later transfer use assumptions from an earlier one, creating an integrity risk. Organizations should treat this as important wherever curl/libcurl is embedded in services, agents, appliances, scripts, or products. Exposure is likely where affected libcurl versions are used directly or bundled into software, containers, operating-system packages, or vendor appliances. Debian, Gentoo, and NetApp advisories indicate downstream impact. Risk is higher for applications that reuse libcurl connections while changing TLS or SSH-related options between transfers. Prioritize remediation in internet-facing, automation-heavy, and vendor-managed environments that rely on curl/libcurl. The main concern is integrity: security settings may not be applied as intended on reused connections. Patch during the next urgent security maintenance window unless vendor exposure analysis proves non-use. Mitigation focus: Upgrade curl/libcurl to 7.83.1 or later where upstream packages are used.; Apply Debian, Gentoo, NetApp, or other vendor security updates for managed platforms.; Rebuild or redeploy applications and containers that bundle or statically link libcurl..
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-840: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2022-27782 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.5 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N3.93.6CISA-ADPVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.5HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://hackerone.com/reports/1555796CVE reference, hackerone
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220609-0009/CVE reference, hackerone
- DSA-5197CVE reference, hackerone · vendor-advisory
- [debian-lts-announce] 20220828 [SECURITY] [DLA 3085-1] curl security updateCVE reference, hackerone · mailing-list
- GLSA-202212-01CVE reference, hackerone · vendor-advisory
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Business Logic Errors
Business Logic Errors represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.