LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-25578: taocms v3.0.2 allows attackers to execute code injection via arbitrarily editing the .htaccess file.

taocms v3.0.2 allows attackers to execute code injection via arbitrarily editing the .htaccess file.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-25578 affects taocms v3.0.2 and involves arbitrary editing of the .htaccess file, which can enable code injection. For a business, the concern is that a vulnerable web CMS could be turned into a path for server-side code execution. Public sources do not provide a CVSS score, named patch, or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority review for any taocms v3.0.2 deployment, especially public websites. The main business risk is unauthorized code execution through web server configuration tampering. Urgency is lower if taocms is not used or .htaccess cannot be modified by the application.

Technical view

The CVE record states taocms v3.0.2 allows attackers to execute code injection by arbitrarily editing .htaccess. The affected version evidence is limited to taocms v3.0.2. No CWE, CVSS vector, authentication requirement, exploit maturity, or vendor-fixed version is provided in the supplied sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running taocms v3.0.2, especially where the application or web server account can modify .htaccess. Internet-facing CMS deployments should be prioritized for review. The sources do not identify other affected versions or products.

Exploitation context

The provided sources include a public GitHub issue and CVE records. CISA KEV status is false, and no cited source states active exploitation. The exact attacker prerequisites are unclear from the available public information.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The CVE description and referenced issue identify arbitrary .htaccess editing leading to code injection, but do not clarify authentication, affected code paths, patch status, or exploit reliability. Avoid assuming broader version impact without additional vendor or repository evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify whether taocms v3.0.2 is deployed in any environment.
  • Check the taocms project for vendor guidance, releases, or issue updates.
  • Prevent the web application process from modifying .htaccess unless required.
  • Restrict administrative and file-editing capabilities to trusted users only.
  • Review and restore .htaccess from a known-good baseline if suspicious.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm deployed taocms versions from application inventory or release files.
  • Review .htaccess permissions and ownership for unnecessary write access.
  • Inspect .htaccess content for unexpected handlers, redirects, or execution directives.
  • Review web and application logs for suspicious configuration changes.
  • Document whether compensating controls prevent .htaccess modification.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-25578 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.