LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-2441: ImageMagick Engine <= 1.7.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Remote Command Execution

The ImageMagick Engine plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to remote code execution via the 'cli_path' parameter in versions up to, and including 1.7.5. This makes it possible for unauthenticated users to run arbitrary commands leading to remote command execution, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This makes it possible for an attacker to create and or modify files hosted on the server which can easily grant attackers backdoor access to the affected server.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-2441 affects the ImageMagick Engine WordPress plugin through version 1.7.5. An attacker who tricks an administrator into clicking a crafted link or taking a similar action could cause command execution on the web server. Successful abuse could allow file changes, persistence, and full site compromise.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for any public WordPress site using this plugin. The attack requires tricking an administrator, but the impact can be full server compromise. This should be handled as a high-priority web application risk, especially on revenue, brand, or customer-facing sites.

Technical view

The issue is a CSRF flaw tied to the plugin's cli_path parameter. The CVE description states unauthenticated attackers can reach remote command execution when administrator interaction is induced. CVSS 3.1 is 8.8 with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but user interaction is required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress installations running ImageMagick Engine versions up to and including 1.7.5. Risk is higher where administrators are likely to follow unsolicited links while authenticated to WordPress. Sites not using this plugin are not indicated as affected by the supplied sources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle includes an Exploit-DB reference, indicating public exploit information exists. The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the provided sources do not establish active exploitation. Treat this as high urgency because compromise impact is server-side command execution, even though administrator interaction is required.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports CSRF to RCE through cli_path in ImageMagick Engine <=1.7.5. Do not claim active exploitation from the supplied sources. The CVE affected block in the bundle is sparse and appears inconsistent, so rely on the description, Wordfence reference, code links, Exploit-DB reference, and Trac changeset for assessment.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for ImageMagick Engine and record installed versions.
  • Upgrade to a version not listed as vulnerable by vendor or Wordfence guidance.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where an immediate verified update is unavailable.
  • Warn WordPress administrators against acting on unsolicited links while authenticated.
  • Review server files and webroots for unexpected modifications if exposure existed.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether ImageMagick Engine is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Verify installed plugin versions are later than 1.7.5 or otherwise vendor-cleared.
  • Check WordPress admin audit logs for unexpected plugin setting changes.
  • Review web server files for new or modified suspicious PHP files.
  • Confirm no exposure remains after update, disablement, or removal.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-2441 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
7Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-2441Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
rickardwImageMagick Engine0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.