LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-2277: A vulnerability exists in the ICCP stack of the affected SYS600 versions due to validation flaw in the process that establishes the ICCP communication. The validation flaw will cause a denial-of-service when ICCP of SYS600 is request to forward any da ...

Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists in the Hitachi Energy MicroSCADA X SYS600's ICCP stack during the ICCP communication establishment causes a denial-of-service when ICCP of SYS600 is request to forward any data item updates with timestamps too distant in the future to any remote ICCP system. By default, ICCP is not configured and not enabled. This issue affects: Hitachi Energy MicroSCADA X SYS600 version 10.2 to version 10.3.1. cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:microscada_x_sys600:10.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-2277 can make affected Hitachi Energy MicroSCADA X SYS600 systems unavailable when their ICCP function handles certain future-dated data item updates during communication setup. The business impact is operational disruption, not data theft. Exposure is narrower because ICCP is not configured or enabled by default.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for utilities or industrial sites using SYS600 ICCP links, especially where availability affects dispatch, monitoring, or control workflows. Do not assume exposure exists unless ICCP is enabled on affected versions.

Technical view

The issue is improper input validation in the SYS600 ICCP stack during ICCP communication establishment. A network attacker needs no privileges or user interaction under the CVSS vector and can trigger high availability impact. Affected versions are MicroSCADA X SYS600 10.2, 10.2.1, 10.3, and 10.3.1.

Likely exposure

Organizations are likely exposed only if they run listed SYS600 versions and have ICCP configured and enabled for remote ICCP communication. Environments without ICCP enabled are less likely to be affected based on the source description.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show confirmed active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. The vulnerability is network-reachable with low attack complexity when ICCP is enabled, so internet or poorly segmented operational technology exposure would increase urgency.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports a denial-of-service condition tied to future-dated data item updates forwarded through ICCP. The source bundle does not include exploit evidence or a specific fixed version. Avoid testing with live operational peers without vendor guidance and change approval.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Hitachi Energy advisory for supported fixes or vendor-approved mitigations.
  • Confirm ICCP is disabled where it is not operationally required.
  • Restrict ICCP access to trusted operational peers only.
  • Prioritize remediation for SYS600 systems supporting critical control-room operations.
  • Monitor SYS600 availability and ICCP-related fault events.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory MicroSCADA X SYS600 deployments and record exact versions.
  • Verify whether ICCP is configured and enabled on each SYS600 instance.
  • Identify remote ICCP peers and network paths to affected systems.
  • Review logs for ICCP communication failures or unexplained SYS600 availability events.
  • Confirm remediation status against Hitachi Energy guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1284: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-2277 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-2277Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Hitachi EnergyMicroSCADA X SYS60010.2, 10.2.1, 10.3, 10.3.1unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.