LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-22202: Junos OS: PTX Series: FPCs may restart unexpectedly upon receipt of specific MPLS packets with certain multi-unit interface configurations

An Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability on specific PTX Series devices, including the PTX1000, PTX3000 (NextGen), PTX5000, PTX10002-60C, PTX10008, and PTX10016 Series, in Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated MPLS-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by triggering the dcpfe process to crash and FPC to restart. On affected PTX Series devices, processing specific MPLS packets received on an interface with multiple units configured may cause FPC to restart unexpectedly. Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue only affects PTX Series devices utilizing specific FPCs found on PTX1000, PTX3000 (NextGen), PTX5000, PTX10002-60C, PTX10008, and PTX10016 Series devices, only if multiple units are configured on the ingress interface, and at least one unit has 'family mpls' *not* configured. See the configuration sample below for more information. No other platforms are affected by this vulnerability. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on PTX Series: All versions prior to 19.1R3-S9; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S6; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S6; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S8; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S4; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S5; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S4; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S4; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S2; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S1; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R2; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R2.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability can make certain Juniper PTX core routing platforms restart forwarding components when they process specific MPLS traffic under a narrow interface configuration. The business impact is service disruption, not data theft. Risk is highest for networks where affected PTX devices handle MPLS traffic from less trusted adjacent networks.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for affected PTX routers in production MPLS paths, especially where adjacent traffic sources are not tightly controlled. This is a service-availability issue with narrow prerequisites, so urgency should be driven by network criticality and confirmed configuration exposure.

Technical view

CVE-2022-22202 is CWE-755 improper exceptional-condition handling in Junos OS on specific PTX Series FPCs. An unauthenticated adjacent MPLS-based attacker can crash dcpfe, causing FPC restart. Repeated triggering can sustain denial of service. Exposure requires affected PTX hardware, vulnerable Junos release, multiple units on the ingress interface, and at least one unit without family mpls configured.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to listed Juniper PTX Series devices and specific FPCs running vulnerable Junos OS versions with the described multi-unit ingress interface configuration. No other platforms are identified as affected in the source bundle.

Exploitation context

The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.5 medium with adjacent attack vector, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact. The bundle does not cite CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The source bundle provides strong affected-version and configuration detail but no exploit samples, observed exploitation, or KEV evidence. Analysis should focus on asset/version/configuration matching and operational indicators of FPC restarts rather than assuming broad internet exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected PTX devices to Junos OS fixed releases listed by Juniper.
  • Review Juniper JSA69706 for approved workarounds and platform-specific guidance.
  • Inventory MPLS-facing PTX interfaces for the vulnerable multi-unit configuration pattern.
  • Where vendor-approved, remove or redesign risky multi-unit ingress interface configurations.
  • Prioritize devices carrying critical MPLS transport or customer-facing traffic.

Validation and detection

  • Identify PTX1000, PTX3000 NextGen, PTX5000, PTX10002-60C, PTX10008, and PTX10016 assets.
  • Compare installed Junos OS versions against the fixed release thresholds in the advisory.
  • Check ingress interfaces with multiple units for any unit lacking family mpls.
  • Review operational logs for dcpfe crashes and unexpected FPC restarts.
  • Confirm post-upgrade versions are at or above the fixed Junos OS releases.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-755: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-22202 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-22202Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Juniper NetworksJunos OSunspecified, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 20.1, 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-755 · source CWE mapping

Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions

Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.