LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-2001: DX Share Selection <= 1.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting

The DX Share Selection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.4. This is due to missing nonce protection on the dxss_admin_page() function found in the ~/dx-share-selection.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts into the page, granted they can trick a site's administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-2001 affects the DX Share Selection WordPress plugin up to version 1.4. A malicious site could trick a logged-in administrator into taking an action that changes plugin settings and injects script into a page. This is high risk for sites still using the plugin because administrator trust is central to WordPress operations.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for public WordPress sites using this plugin, especially business-critical sites. The issue is not proven actively exploited in the provided sources, but the impact can include administrator-context script execution and site compromise risk.

Technical view

The issue is missing nonce protection in dxss_admin_page() in dx-share-selection.php. The flaw is categorized as CSRF and can lead to script injection when an administrator is induced to perform an action. The provided CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8 high, with network attack vector, no privileges required, and user interaction required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with DX Share Selection installed at version 1.4 or earlier. Evidence in the bundle does not identify other affected products.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation requires social engineering of a site administrator, such as getting them to click a link while authenticated.

Researcher notes

Key evidence points to missing CSRF nonce protection in dxss_admin_page() and a WordPress plugin changeset reference. The source bundle does not provide exploit telemetry, broad scanning evidence, or a clearly named fixed version, so remediation should be confirmed against vendor sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for DX Share Selection version 1.4 or earlier.
  • Check WordPress.org and vendor guidance for a fixed release or remediation notice.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is unnecessary or unsupported.
  • Limit administrator browsing from active WordPress sessions until remediated.
  • Review affected pages and plugin settings for unexpected script content.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether DX Share Selection is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record installed plugin version and compare it to version 1.4 or earlier.
  • Review plugin settings pages for unexpected injected script content.
  • Check administrator activity around suspicious links or unexpected settings changes.
  • Verify remediation against vendor or WordPress.org guidance, not assumptions.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-2001 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-2001Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
nofearincDX Share Selection0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.