LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-1985: Download Manager <= 3.2.42 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting

The Download Manager Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to reflected Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including 3.2.42. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the 'frameid' parameter found in the ~/src/Package/views/shortcode-iframe.php file.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A WordPress Download Manager plugin flaw allowed a crafted link to run attacker-supplied JavaScript in a visitor’s browser if clicked. It affects versions up to and including 3.2.42. This can expose session context or alter page content, but requires user interaction and is not listed as actively exploited in KEV.

Executive priority

Treat as a normal-priority web application remediation item. It is not critical, but public WordPress plugins are broadly targeted, and XSS can support credential theft or session abuse when users click malicious links.

Technical view

CVE-2022-1985 is reflected XSS (CWE-79) caused by insufficient sanitization and output escaping of the frameid parameter in shortcode-iframe.php. The published CVSS v3.1 score is 6.1: network-reachable, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites running the Download Manager plugin at version 3.2.42 or earlier, especially where public pages render the affected iframe shortcode path.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Practical abuse would require persuading a user to open a crafted URL, consistent with reflected XSS and the UI:R CVSS vector.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies the sink as frameid in shortcode-iframe.php and classifies the bug as reflected XSS. The provided sources do not establish active exploitation. Avoid assuming broader Download Manager components are affected without vendor or code evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites using the Download Manager plugin.
  • Upgrade affected installations to a current vendor-supported release.
  • Confirm vendor release notes for the fixed version before closing remediation.
  • Use WAF or filtering controls as compensating protection where updates are delayed.
  • Review administrative sessions for unusual activity after suspected exposure.

Validation and detection

  • Check installed Download Manager plugin versions across WordPress assets.
  • Flag versions up to and including 3.2.42 as vulnerable.
  • Review pages using Download Manager iframe shortcodes or related routes.
  • Confirm the plugin is updated and no vulnerable version remains deployed.
  • Verify remediation against Wordfence, CVE, and WordPress plugin references.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-1985 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-1985Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
codename065Download Manager0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.