LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-1751: Skitter Slideshow <= 2.5.2 - Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery

The Skitter Slideshow plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2 via the /image.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

HighCVSS 7.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-1751 affects the WordPress Skitter Slideshow plugin up to 2.5.2. An unauthenticated attacker can make the website server send requests to arbitrary locations, potentially reaching internal services not exposed to the internet.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for public WordPress sites where the server has internal network reach. This is high-risk due to unauthenticated access, but urgency is lower than known-exploited issues absent KEV or active exploitation evidence.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-918 server-side request forgery in the plugin's /image.php file. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.2 with network access, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction required. Impact is listed as low confidentiality and integrity with changed scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on internet-facing WordPress sites running Skitter Slideshow version 2.5.2 or earlier, especially where the web server can reach internal APIs, metadata services, or administrative endpoints.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Public references describe the issue as unauthenticated SSRF, but the provided evidence does not establish current exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Source metadata names Skitter Slideshow <= 2.5.2 and /image.php as the vulnerable component. The affected-product record appears incomplete or inconsistent, so validate against installed plugin files and vendor intelligence before broad assumptions.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all WordPress sites using Skitter Slideshow.
  • Disable or remove affected versions until vendor guidance is confirmed.
  • Upgrade only if a trusted fixed version is available.
  • Restrict web server outbound access to required destinations.
  • Block web server access to internal administration and metadata services.

Validation and detection

  • Check WordPress plugin inventories for Skitter Slideshow versions up to 2.5.2.
  • Confirm whether the plugin's image.php file is reachable publicly.
  • Review web access logs for unexpected requests to the plugin image handler.
  • Map what internal services the WordPress host can reach.
  • Verify compensating egress controls from the web server network.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-1751 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N3.92.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.2High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-1751Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
thiagosfSkitter Slideshow0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.