LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-47841: SnipCommand 0.1.0 - Persistent Cross-Site Scripting

SnipCommand 0.1.0 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious payloads into command snippets. Attackers can execute arbitrary code by embedding malicious JavaScript that triggers remote command execution through file or title inputs.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-47841 affects SnipCommand 0.1.0, a command-snippet tool. It allows stored cross-site scripting through snippet file or title inputs. A victim who opens a malicious snippet may run attacker-supplied JavaScript in the application context. Public proof-of-concept material exists, but the provided sources do not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted medium-priority remediation item. It is not KEV-listed and requires user interaction, but public exploit material exists. Prioritize if SnipCommand is used by developers, administrators, or teams handling sensitive systems.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-79 persistent XSS in gurayyarar SnipCommand 0.1.0. The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.1, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and required user interaction. Sources state malicious JavaScript can be embedded in command snippets through file or title inputs, potentially leading to remote command execution behavior in the affected application context.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments using SnipCommand 0.1.0, especially where users import, share, or open untrusted command snippets. Systems not running this product and version are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

Exploit-DB and a proof-of-concept video are referenced, so exploit details are public. The CVSS vector requires user interaction. CISA KEV status is false in the provided bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse and primarily third-party. The affected product and version are clearly stated as gurayyarar SnipCommand 0.1.0. The sources describe stored XSS and potential command execution impact, but do not provide confirmed patch status or observed exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify whether SnipCommand 0.1.0 is installed or distributed internally.
  • Check the SnipCommand repository and advisory sources for vendor guidance or updates.
  • Avoid opening or importing untrusted snippets in affected environments.
  • Restrict access to affected SnipCommand instances or workflows where possible.
  • Remove or replace SnipCommand 0.1.0 if no safe update is available.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory endpoints and repositories for SnipCommand 0.1.0 usage.
  • Review snippet storage for unexpected script content in titles or file fields.
  • Confirm whether users exchange SnipCommand snippets from untrusted sources.
  • Monitor security tools for browser-script execution linked to SnipCommand usage.
  • Document compensating controls if the affected version remains in use.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-47841 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-47841Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
gurayyararSnipCommand0.1.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.