LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-47835: Freeter 1.2.1 - Persistent Cross-Site Scripting

Freeter 1.2.1 contains a persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to store malicious payloads in custom widget titles and files. Attackers can craft malicious files with embedded scripts that execute when victims interact with the application, potentially enabling remote code execution.

HighCVSS 7.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Freeter 1.2.1 has a stored cross-site scripting flaw. Malicious content can be saved in widget titles or files and later run when a user interacts with the application. The sources describe possible escalation impact, including remote code execution, but do not show confirmed real-world exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority endpoint/application risk if Freeter is used. Prioritize inventory and user exposure reduction now, because public exploit references exist and no confirmed fix is provided in the source bundle.

Technical view

CVE-2021-47835 is CWE-79 persistent XSS in Freeter 1.2.1. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.2 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and changed scope. Public exploit and proof-of-concept references exist. No vendor patch details are provided in the supplied sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations or users running Freeter 1.2.1, especially where users open shared or untrusted Freeter files or configure custom widgets from untrusted sources.

Exploitation context

Public exploit material and a proof-of-concept video are referenced, so the issue is reproducible. The source bundle does not indicate CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The record names Freeter 1.2.1 only. The bundle includes ExploitDB and PoC references, but not exploitation telemetry. The description links stored XSS to potential remote code execution; validate that claim against advisory details before expanding impact assumptions.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify whether Freeter 1.2.1 is installed or in use.
  • Check Freeter and advisory sources for updated vendor guidance or fixed versions.
  • Avoid opening untrusted Freeter files or widget configurations.
  • Remove suspicious custom widget titles or files from Freeter workspaces.
  • Limit use of Freeter to trusted content until remediation is confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory endpoints for Freeter and confirm version 1.2.1 presence.
  • Review Freeter workspaces for untrusted custom widget titles or files.
  • Check security tools for script execution alerts linked to Freeter activity.
  • Verify whether vendor guidance or a newer safe version is available.
  • Document affected users and exposure to shared Freeter content.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-47835 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N3.92.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.2High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-47835Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FreeterFreeter1.2.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.