LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-46873: WireGuard, such as WireGuard 0.5.3 on Windows, does not fully account for the possibility that an adversary...

WireGuard, such as WireGuard 0.5.3 on Windows, does not fully account for the possibility that an adversary might be able to set a victim's system time to a future value, e.g., because unauthenticated NTP is used. This can lead to an outcome in which one static private key becomes permanently useless.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue can let an attacker who can force a victim system clock far into the future break a WireGuard static private key. The cited impact is availability, not data theft or tampering. Business urgency depends on whether WireGuard systems rely on unauthenticated or weakly controlled time synchronization.

Executive priority

Address in normal vulnerability management unless VPN availability is mission-critical or time synchronization is weak. The key business risk is loss of VPN availability, not breach of confidentiality based on the provided sources.

Technical view

CVE-2021-46873 concerns WireGuard, with WireGuard 0.5.3 on Windows cited as an example. If an adversary can set system time to a future value, such as through unauthenticated NTP, WireGuard may make one static private key permanently unusable. CVSS 3.1 is 5.3 with low availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most plausible on WireGuard endpoints where system time can be manipulated remotely or through unauthenticated NTP. The source bundle does not provide a complete affected product or version matrix.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation requires the attacker to influence the victim system time, then trigger the WireGuard key-usability failure. Treat this as targeted availability risk, not confirmed widespread exploitation.

Researcher notes

The CVE record lacks a detailed affected-version matrix and names WireGuard 0.5.3 on Windows only as an example. The root condition is attacker influence over future system time; validation should focus on time-source trust and observed key failure behavior.

Mitigation direction

  • Check WireGuard project or vendor guidance for affected versions and fixes.
  • Remove unauthenticated or untrusted time synchronization from WireGuard hosts.
  • Use trusted, controlled time sources where available.
  • Prepare recovery steps for replacing unusable WireGuard static private keys.
  • Prioritize internet-facing or business-critical VPN endpoints first.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WireGuard endpoints and record client versions, especially Windows deployments.
  • Review NTP and time synchronization configuration on WireGuard hosts.
  • Check logs for unexpected large future clock jumps.
  • Look for WireGuard connectivity failures after time synchronization anomalies.
  • Confirm whether vendors identify your deployed version as affected.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-362: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-46873 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-46873Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-362 · source CWE mapping

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.