LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-4473: Tianxin Internet Behavior Management System Command Injection via toQuery.php

Tianxin Internet Behavior Management System contains a command injection vulnerability in the Reporter component endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands by supplying a crafted objClass parameter containing shell metacharacters and output redirection. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to write malicious PHP files into the web root and achieve remote code execution with the privileges of the web server process. This vulnerability has been fixed in version NACFirmware_4.0.0.7_20210716.180815_topsec_0_basic.bin. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-06-01 (UTC).

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets an unauthenticated attacker run commands on a vulnerable Tianxin Internet Behavior Management System. Successful compromise could give control of the web server process and allow malicious files to be placed on the device. For exposed appliances, this is a business-critical remote takeover risk.

Executive priority

Prioritize immediately if the product is deployed, especially internet-facing. The vulnerability is unauthenticated, network reachable, critical severity, and has reported exploitation evidence. Patch or isolate affected appliances before routine remediation work.

Technical view

CVE-2021-4473 is a CWE-78 command injection issue in the Reporter component, associated with toQuery.php and objClass handling. The source bundle reports arbitrary command execution and web-root file writes, enabling remote code execution under web server privileges. The named fixed firmware is NACFirmware_4.0.0.7_20210716.180815_topsec_0_basic.bin.

Likely exposure

Organizations using Beijing Topsec Tianxin Internet Behavior Management System are the relevant population. Exposure is highest where the management or Reporter web interface is reachable from untrusted networks and firmware predates the named fixed build. The source bundle does not define a broad product matrix beyond this product.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV status is false in the provided bundle. However, the bundle reports exploitation evidence first observed by Shadowserver on 2024-06-01 UTC. Public references also include technical and exploit-tagged advisories, so defenders should treat exposed systems as high risk.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strong for impact, fixed firmware, and reported exploitation evidence, but affected version data in the bundle is sparse. Avoid assuming all Topsec products are affected. Validation should focus on product identification, firmware state, reachability, logs, and file-system indicators.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Tianxin Internet Behavior Management System deployments and firmware versions.
  • Upgrade to the named fixed firmware or follow current vendor patch guidance.
  • Remove public exposure of management and Reporter interfaces where possible.
  • Restrict administrative access to trusted networks or VPN paths.
  • Review web roots and system integrity for unexpected PHP files.
  • Monitor for web server process command execution indicators.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any Tianxin Internet Behavior Management System is deployed.
  • Verify firmware against NACFirmware_4.0.0.7_20210716.180815_topsec_0_basic.bin or vendor guidance.
  • Check external attack surface for reachable management or Reporter endpoints.
  • Review logs around and after 2024-06-01 UTC for suspicious web requests.
  • Inspect device web directories for unauthorized PHP files.
  • Confirm compensating network controls block untrusted access.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-4473 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9VulnCheck
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2021-4473Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Beijing Topsec Network Security Technology Co., Ltd.Tianxin Internet Behavior Management System0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.