LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-44409: A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink...

A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to a reboot. TestWifi param is not object. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE affects a named Reolink RLC-410W firmware build and can let an unauthenticated network attacker force the device to reboot through a crafted HTTP request. The direct business impact is camera downtime, not data theft, but availability loss can matter where cameras support security operations.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-exposed or security-critical camera deployments. This is an availability risk that can disrupt monitoring coverage. If affected firmware is present, reduce network exposure while confirming whether an official firmware update or vendor mitigation exists.

Technical view

The flaw is improper input validation in cgiserver.cgi's JSON command parser. The source description states that a malformed TestWifi parameter can trigger a reboot on Reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. CVSS 8.6 reflects network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations using Reolink RLC-410W firmware v3.0.0.136_20121102 are the only exposure named in the bundle. Risk is highest if the camera HTTP interface is reachable from untrusted networks. The CVE affected-products metadata is incomplete and lists vendor/product/version as n/a.

Exploitation context

No CISA KEV listing is provided, and the bundle does not state active exploitation. The source says an attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger the vulnerability. Treat this as plausible remote denial of service where affected devices expose the vulnerable CGI endpoint.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies CWE-20 improper input validation in the JSON parser for cgiserver.cgi. The bundle does not provide affected CPEs, patch status, or active exploitation evidence. Avoid assuming broader Reolink model impact beyond the named RLC-410W firmware build.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Reolink RLC-410W devices running v3.0.0.136_20121102.
  • Check Reolink or Talos guidance for fixed firmware or official mitigation.
  • Restrict camera HTTP management access to trusted admin networks only.
  • Block internet exposure for affected camera interfaces.
  • Monitor affected cameras for unexpected reboot patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory camera models and firmware versions from asset records or device administration pages.
  • Confirm whether cgiserver.cgi is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review firewall, VPN, and segmentation rules protecting camera management interfaces.
  • Check operational logs or monitoring for unexplained camera reboots.
  • Document gaps where firmware status or vendor fix availability is unknown.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-44409 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H3.94Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2021-44409Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.