LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-44396: A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink...

A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to a reboot. Preview param is not object. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE can let an unauthenticated network attacker force a vulnerable Reolink RLC-410W camera to reboot by sending a malformed HTTP request to its CGI interface. The business impact is availability: cameras may be knocked offline, interrupting monitoring or incident review. Sources do not state data theft, integrity impact, a vendor fix, or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation where affected cameras support security operations, regulated monitoring, or safety workflows. The issue is not described as data compromise, but repeated reboots can create surveillance gaps. Act quickly for exposed devices; otherwise handle through firmware governance and network segmentation.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-20 improper input validation in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser. On Reolink RLC-410W firmware v3.0.0.136_20121102, a malformed Preview parameter that is not an object can trigger denial of service/reboot. CVSS 3.0 is 8.6: network, low complexity, unauthenticated, no user interaction, changed scope, high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Reolink RLC-410W cameras running firmware v3.0.0.136_20121102 with the HTTP CGI interface reachable from untrusted networks. Internet-facing cameras, flat internal networks, and camera management interfaces reachable from guest or contractor networks raise urgency.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says an attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger reboot. CISA KEV status is false, and the provided sources do not report active exploitation. Treat this as a practical availability risk because exploitation requires no authentication and low complexity, but do not assume observed attacks without local evidence.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies one firmware build and one affected camera model. The public bundle does not provide a patch version, official mitigation, or exploitation telemetry. Validation should focus on asset identification, reachable management surfaces, and operational reboot evidence rather than reproducing the malformed request.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Reolink guidance for fixed firmware or official workarounds.
  • Remove camera management interfaces from internet exposure.
  • Restrict HTTP access to trusted management networks only.
  • Place affected cameras behind firewall or VPN controls.
  • Monitor vulnerable cameras for unexpected reboot patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Reolink RLC-410W cameras and record firmware versions.
  • Identify any device running v3.0.0.136_20121102.
  • Confirm whether cgiserver.cgi is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review logs or uptime data for unexplained camera reboots.
  • Track vendor advisories for patch availability or mitigation updates.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-44396 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H3.94Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2021-44396Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.