LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-44393: A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink...

A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to a reboot. GetIsp param is not object. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability can let an unauthenticated network attacker reboot an affected Reolink RLC-410W camera by sending malformed input to its CGI JSON parser. The business impact is availability: cameras may become unreliable or unavailable during an incident, outage, or repeated disruption attempt.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority availability risk for sites relying on affected cameras for monitoring, response, or physical security. Prioritize exposure reduction first, then firmware/vendor validation.

Technical view

CVE-2021-44393 is a CWE-20 input validation flaw in cgiserver.cgi JSON command parsing on Reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. The source states a malformed GetIsp parameter can trigger a reboot. CVSS 3.0 is 8.6, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where affected Reolink RLC-410W cameras expose the web or CGI management interface to untrusted networks. The CVE affected-product metadata is incomplete, but the description names RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102.

Exploitation context

The provided bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates remote, unauthenticated triggering is possible, but the documented impact is denial of service through reboot, not confidentiality or integrity compromise.

Researcher notes

The core condition is malformed JSON command input where GetIsp is not an object, causing device reboot. Source evidence supports denial of service only. Affected metadata in the CVE record is sparse, so validation should anchor on the named model and firmware from the description.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify affected Reolink RLC-410W cameras and confirm firmware versions.
  • Remove camera management interfaces from direct internet exposure.
  • Restrict access to trusted management networks or VPN-only administration paths.
  • Check Reolink and Talos guidance for firmware updates or vendor mitigations.
  • Monitor affected cameras for unexpected reboots or availability drops.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Reolink RLC-410W devices and record firmware versions.
  • Confirm whether cgiserver.cgi or web administration is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review firewall, NAT, and remote-access rules protecting camera management paths.
  • Check device uptime and logs for unexplained reboot patterns.
  • Document compensating controls where vendor patch status is unclear.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-44393 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H3.94Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2021-44393Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.