LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-44392: A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink...

A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to a reboot. GetImage param is not object. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets an unauthenticated network attacker reboot a specific Reolink camera by sending a malformed HTTP request. It does not indicate data theft or settings changes, but it can interrupt video availability. The sources identify Reolink RLC-410W firmware v3.0.0.136_20121102; broader affected scope is not established in the bundle.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for exposed surveillance environments because the business impact is loss of camera availability. Prioritize internet-facing or broadly reachable cameras first. Internally isolated devices still need firmware and access-control review, but urgency depends on operational reliance and network trust boundaries.

Technical view

CVE-2021-44392 is a CWE-20 input validation issue in cgiserver.cgi JSON command parsing. Talos and CVE describe a denial of service when the GetImage parameter is not an object, causing reboot via HTTP. CVSS 3.0 is 8.6, network-reachable, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Reolink RLC-410W cameras running v3.0.0.136_20121102 have the HTTP CGI interface reachable from untrusted networks. Internet-exposed camera management interfaces are the highest concern. The source bundle does not confirm other models, firmware branches, or CPE entries.

Exploitation context

The bundle supports remote, unauthenticated denial of service via crafted HTTP request. It does not cite active exploitation, and CISA KEV status is false. No public source in the bundle supports confidentiality, integrity, persistence, or code execution impact.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow: the bundle names Reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102 and describes GetImage type confusion in JSON parsing. Do not generalize affected products without vendor confirmation. Testing should avoid disruptive payloads on production cameras because successful validation may reboot the device.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Reolink and Talos guidance for fixed firmware or official mitigations.
  • Update affected cameras if a vendor-supported firmware fix is available.
  • Remove camera management interfaces from internet exposure.
  • Restrict HTTP CGI access to trusted management networks only.
  • Use firewall or VPN controls for remote administration.
  • Monitor affected devices for unexpected reboot patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Reolink RLC-410W devices and firmware versions.
  • Identify cameras exposing HTTP management to untrusted networks.
  • Review logs or monitoring for unexpected reboots.
  • Check for requests targeting cgiserver.cgi or GetImage handling.
  • Confirm segmentation blocks unauthenticated access from untrusted sources.
  • Track vendor advisory status before closing remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-44392 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H3.94Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2021-44392Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.