LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-44364: A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink...

A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to a reboot. SetWifi param is not object. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability can make a vulnerable Reolink RLC-410W camera reboot when it receives malformed input to its web CGI interface. The business impact is service disruption: cameras may become temporarily unavailable, affecting monitoring coverage and incident visibility. The bundle does not name a confirmed patch or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority availability risk for sites relying on affected cameras for security monitoring. The urgency is highest for exposed or remotely reachable devices. Prioritize inventory, access restriction, and vendor-firmware review; do not assume a patch exists unless confirmed by vendor guidance.

Technical view

CVE-2021-44364 is a high-severity CWE-20 input validation issue in cgiserver.cgi JSON command parsing on Reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. The cited description says the SetWifi parameter is not an object, and a crafted HTTP request can trigger a reboot. CVSS 3.0 is 8.6, network-accessible, unauthenticated, no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where affected Reolink RLC-410W cameras expose the HTTP management interface to untrusted networks. Internet-facing cameras, flat CCTV networks, and remote-management paths increase risk. The CVE affected-product metadata is incomplete, but the description names RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. Public technical reporting exists from Cisco Talos, so defenders should assume the issue is documented, but not treat exploitation as confirmed from these sources.

Researcher notes

The CVE data provides a clear vulnerability class and affected firmware string, but the affected CPE fields are not populated and no fix is named in the bundle. Avoid production proof testing with malformed requests unless formally authorized, because the expected impact is device reboot and monitoring disruption.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Reolink RLC-410W cameras running v3.0.0.136_20121102.
  • Check Reolink and Talos guidance for firmware updates or vendor-recommended mitigations.
  • Remove camera HTTP management interfaces from internet exposure.
  • Restrict camera administration to trusted management networks or VPN paths.
  • Segment CCTV devices from business-critical networks.
  • Monitor affected cameras for unexpected reboot or availability events.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory camera model and firmware versions from asset records or management consoles.
  • Verify whether HTTP management is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Confirm affected devices are not directly internet-facing.
  • Review monitoring for unexplained camera reboot or downtime patterns.
  • Check vendor guidance for available fixed firmware before remediation closure.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-44364 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H3.94Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2021-44364Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.