LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-4425: Defender Security <= 2.4.6 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass

The Defender Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the verify_otp_login_time() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to verify a one time login via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE affects the WordPress Defender Security plugin through version 2.4.6. A malicious site or link could cause a logged-in administrator’s browser to verify a one-time login without proper request validation. Business impact is limited but relevant because it touches login security controls.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted maintenance item, not an emergency. Prioritize affected public WordPress sites where administrators frequently remain logged in, because the issue weakens a login-security function but requires administrator interaction.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-352 CSRF caused by missing or incorrect nonce validation in verify_otp_login_time(). The CVSS 3.1 score is 4.3, with network access, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and low integrity impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites running Defender Security versions up to and including 2.4.6. Sites without this plugin, or running a fixed newer version, are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation requires tricking a site administrator into taking an action, such as clicking a link, while the vulnerable workflow is reachable.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports a CSRF bypass in a specific Defender Security function. The source bundle does not provide proof of active exploitation, a detailed exploit chain, or a named fixed version beyond the vulnerable range ending at 2.4.6.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Defender Security plugin usage and version.
  • Update Defender Security beyond version 2.4.6 using vendor-supported releases.
  • Review WPMU DEV or WordPress plugin guidance for the confirmed fixed version.
  • Limit WordPress administrator accounts to necessary users only.
  • Warn administrators against opening untrusted links while authenticated.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Defender Security is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record plugin versions and flag any version up to 2.4.6.
  • Verify the installed version includes corrected nonce validation for verify_otp_login_time().
  • Check vulnerability scanners or Wordfence intelligence for matching findings.
  • Review admin activity logs for unusual one-time login verification events.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-4425 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
10Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-4425Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
wpmudevDefender Security – Malware Scanner, Login Security & Firewall0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.