LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-4421: Advanced Popups <= 1.1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass

The Advanced Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metabox_popup_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save meta tags via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-4421 affects the Advanced Popups WordPress plugin through version 1.1.1. A malicious site or link could cause a logged-in administrator to save popup-related meta tags without proper request validation. Business impact is limited integrity risk, but affected sites should update, disable, or remove the plugin if still present.

Executive priority

Treat as routine but time-bound remediation for affected WordPress assets. Prioritize public marketing sites and sites with many administrators because successful exploitation depends on administrator interaction, not direct remote compromise.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-352 cross-site request forgery caused by missing or incorrect nonce validation in metabox_popup_save(). The CVSS v3.1 score is 4.3: network reachable, low complexity, no attacker privileges, user interaction required, with low integrity impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running Advanced Popups version 1.1.1 or earlier. Successful abuse requires a logged-in administrator to interact with a forged request, such as clicking a malicious link.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The attack is opportunistic and user-driven rather than directly unauthenticated takeover. Evidence supports unauthorized saving of meta tags, not confidentiality loss or availability impact.

Researcher notes

The public record identifies metabox_popup_save() nonce validation as the vulnerable control. The source bundle does not name a specific patched version or provide evidence of exploitation in the wild. Avoid assuming broader impact beyond meta tag modification.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Advanced Popups plugin.
  • Update Advanced Popups to a vendor-fixed release; if unavailable, disable or remove it.
  • Avoid using affected plugin versions 1.1.1 or earlier.
  • Limit administrator browsing while logged in and avoid untrusted links.
  • Review vendor and WordPress plugin guidance for the confirmed fixed release.

Validation and detection

  • Check each WordPress site for Advanced Popups installation and version.
  • Flag any installation at version 1.1.1 or earlier.
  • Review popup metadata for unexpected administrator-attributed changes.
  • Review WordPress admin activity around suspicious content changes.
  • Confirm remediation by verifying the plugin is updated, disabled, or removed.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-4421 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
10Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-4421Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
codesupplycoAdvanced Popups0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.