LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-4408: DW Question & Answer <= 1.5.8 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass

The DW Question & Answer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.5.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the update_answer() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update answers to questions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-4408 affects the DW Question & Answer WordPress plugin through version 1.5.8. A malicious site or link could cause a logged-in administrator to unknowingly change an answer. The issue is medium severity because it requires admin interaction and mainly affects content integrity, not data theft or system takeover.

Executive priority

Treat this as a routine integrity-risk fix for affected WordPress sites, not an emergency. Prioritize public sites using the plugin, especially where answer content is customer-facing, trusted, or compliance-relevant.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-352 cross-site request forgery in DW Question & Answer's update_answer() handling, caused by missing or incorrect nonce validation. The CVSS 3.1 score is 4.3, with network access, low complexity, no attacker privileges, required user interaction, and low integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running DW Question & Answer versions up to and including 1.5.8. Sites without the plugin, with newer unaffected versions, or with no administrator interaction with attacker-controlled content are less exposed.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Abuse requires tricking a logged-in site administrator into taking an action, such as opening a malicious link, so phishing or social engineering is a necessary condition.

Researcher notes

The record identifies the vulnerable function and CSRF class, but the bundle does not provide full remediation details or active exploitation evidence. Validate against the plugin code and vendor release history before asserting a specific fixed version.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for DW Question & Answer installations.
  • Update the plugin beyond version 1.5.8 if vendor guidance confirms availability.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is unused or unsupported.
  • Limit administrator browsing while logged into WordPress.
  • Review vendor, Wordfence, and WordPress plugin guidance for confirmed remediation details.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether DW Question & Answer is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Check plugin versions and flag anything at or below 1.5.8.
  • Verify update_answer() handling includes valid nonce enforcement before content changes.
  • Review answer edit history for unexpected administrator-attributed changes.
  • Check web logs around suspicious admin sessions or reported phishing clicks.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-4408 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
10Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-4408Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
designwallDW Question & Answer0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.