LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-4394: Locations <= 3.2.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass

The Locations plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the saveCustomFields() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update custom field meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-4394 affects the WordPress Locations plugin through version 3.2.1. A malicious site or link could cause an authenticated administrator’s browser to change custom field metadata without proper CSRF protection. Business impact is limited but real: unauthorized content or metadata changes on affected WordPress sites.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority WordPress hygiene issue. It is not evidenced as actively exploited, but affected public sites with active administrators should be remediated during the next normal security maintenance window.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-352 CSRF in the Locations plugin saveCustomFields() function, caused by missing or incorrect nonce validation. The CVSS 3.1 score is 4.3, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required by the attacker, required user interaction, and low integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the Locations plugin at version 3.2.1 or earlier. The attacker does not need an account, but must induce a site administrator to perform an action while authenticated.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The practical attack context is social engineering against an authenticated WordPress administrator to trigger a forged request that updates custom field metadata.

Researcher notes

The source data clearly identifies CSRF and the vulnerable function, but product version metadata is sparse and partly inconsistent. Avoid assuming wider impact beyond the Locations plugin through 3.2.1 unless vendor or repository evidence confirms it.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Locations plugin and record installed versions.
  • Update the plugin beyond version 3.2.1 where vendor or WordPress guidance supports it.
  • If updates are unavailable, disable the plugin until vendor guidance is confirmed.
  • Limit administrator browsing from active WordPress sessions where practical.
  • Review recent custom field metadata changes for unexpected modifications.

Validation and detection

  • Check WordPress plugin inventories for Locations versions 3.2.1 or earlier.
  • Confirm whether the installed version includes nonce validation for saveCustomFields().
  • Review WordPress admin audit logs for unexpected custom field metadata updates.
  • Verify remediation by confirming the plugin is updated, disabled, or otherwise mitigated.
  • Track vendor, Wordfence, and WordPress plugin repository guidance for current status.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-4394 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
10Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-4394Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
richardgabrielLocations0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.