LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-4390: Contact Form 7 Style <= 3.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass

The Contact Form 7 Style plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the manage_wp_posts_be_qe_save_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to quick edit templates via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This affects WordPress sites using Contact Form 7 Style up to version 3.2. A malicious site or link could cause a logged-in administrator’s browser to change plugin templates without proper request verification. The reported impact is limited integrity change, not data theft or service outage.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate WordPress integrity risk. It is not reported as actively exploited in the provided sources, but affected public sites should be remediated during normal vulnerability maintenance because administrator interaction can still produce unauthorized content changes.

Technical view

CVE-2021-4390 is a CSRF issue in Contact Form 7 Style for WordPress through 3.2. The manage_wp_posts_be_qe_save_post() function lacks correct nonce validation, allowing forged quick-edit template changes when an administrator is induced to perform an action. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3, CWE-352.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress installations with Contact Form 7 Style version 3.2 or earlier installed and accessible to administrators. Sites without the plugin, or without vulnerable versions, are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV inclusion or confirmed active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction by a site administrator, typically through a deceptive link or page, and would target template integrity rather than confidentiality or availability.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies the vulnerable function and CSRF root cause, but the provided bundle does not name a specific fixed version. Avoid assuming exploit activity or patch status beyond the cited sources. Validate exposure through plugin version inventory and code review of nonce checks.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Contact Form 7 Style installations and versions.
  • Check vendor, WordPress plugin, or Wordfence guidance for a fixed release.
  • Update if a fixed version is available from trusted sources.
  • Disable or remove vulnerable installations if no maintained fix is available.
  • Warn administrators against clicking untrusted links while authenticated.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Contact Form 7 Style is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Flag versions up to and including 3.2 for remediation review.
  • Review template history for unexpected quick-edit changes.
  • Verify remediated code includes proper nonce validation for the affected save path.
  • Document any remaining exception with owner and compensating controls.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-4390 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
10Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-4390Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ionuticlanzanContact Form 7 Style0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.