LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-4258: whohas Package Information cleartext transmission

A vulnerability was found in whohas. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Package Information Handler. The manipulation leads to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. The attack may be initiated remotely. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The name of the patch is 667c3e2e9178f15c23d7918b5db25cd0792c8472. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216251. NOTE: Most sources redirect to the encrypted site which limits the possibilities of an attack.

LowCVSS 3.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-4258 describes possible sensitive package information exposure in whohas due to cleartext transmission. Business urgency is low because severity is low, attack complexity is high, and the source notes the vulnerability’s existence is doubted and redirects often limit exposure.

Executive priority

Treat as low-priority remediation unless whohas is used in sensitive operational workflows. The main action is inventory and patch verification, not emergency response.

Technical view

The issue affects an unspecified whohas Package Information Handler path. The reported weakness is cleartext transmission of sensitive information, mapped to CWE-310, with CVSS 3.1 score 3.7: network attack vector, high complexity, no privileges, and low confidentiality impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments using whohas, with affected versions not specified. Risk is most relevant where package information requests can still occur over unencrypted transport and contain sensitive data.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV is false. The report says remote initiation is possible, but also says the vulnerability’s real existence is doubted and redirects to encrypted sites reduce attack opportunity.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited: product is identified as whohas, but affected versions and exact processing path are unspecified. The report explicitly questions existence, so validation should focus on source comparison and observed cleartext behavior rather than assumptions.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory whohas installations and identify whether the patch commit is present.
  • Apply the referenced upstream patch or update to a release containing it.
  • Prefer encrypted package information sources and vendor-supported defaults.
  • Avoid sending sensitive data through whohas package lookup workflows.
  • Track CVE, VulDB, and upstream whohas guidance for version-specific fixes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm deployed whohas code includes commit 667c3e2e9178f15c23d7918b5db25cd0792c8472.
  • Review whohas package information traffic for unencrypted requests in normal operation.
  • Check whether any package lookup workflows include sensitive values.
  • Document affected hosts, package versions, and remediation status.
  • Retest after update to confirm cleartext paths are removed or redirected.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-310: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-4258 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.7CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N2.21.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.7Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-4258Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
unspecifiedwhohasn/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-310 · source CWE mapping

Cryptographic Issues

Cryptographic Issues represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.