LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-42364: Stetic <= 1.0.6 Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting

The Stetic WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation via the stats_page function found in the ~/stetic.php file, which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 1.0.6.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Stetic for WordPress up to version 1.0.6 allowed a forged request to change plugin-controlled content and store malicious script. A successful attack would require user interaction, but could affect website visitors or administrators once stored.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure if Stetic is deployed. The main business risk is persistent script injection on a public website, potentially affecting trust, sessions, and site integrity.

Technical view

The vulnerability is a CSRF flaw in Stetic's stats_page function caused by missing nonce validation. The reported impact is stored cross-site scripting, allowing arbitrary web scripts in affected versions up to and including 1.0.6.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the Stetic plugin version 1.0.6 or earlier. Sites without this plugin are not affected based on the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates network reachability, low complexity, no attacker privileges, and required user interaction. The bundle says CISA KEV is false, and no cited source confirms active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies CWE-352 and stored XSS via missing nonce validation in stats_page. The sources do not name a fixed version, exploit-in-the-wild evidence, or detailed remediation beyond the affected version statement.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Stetic plugin and affected versions.
  • Remove or disable Stetic if it is unnecessary or unmaintained.
  • Check Wordfence, WordPress plugin, and vendor guidance for fixed release information.
  • Review affected sites for unexpected stored scripts or plugin setting changes.
  • Harden administrator sessions and avoid clicking untrusted links while remediation is pending.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Stetic is installed and enabled on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed Stetic version and compare it with 1.0.6.
  • Review plugin-managed pages or settings for unexpected script content.
  • Check security monitoring for suspicious WordPress admin activity.
  • Do not claim active exploitation without KEV or source evidence.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-42364 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-42364Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SteticStetic1.0.6Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.