LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-40335: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Hitachi Energy’s MSM Product

A vulnerability exists in the HTTP web interface where the web interface does not sufficiently verify if a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This cause a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF), which if exploited could lead an attacker to gain unauthorized access to the web application and perform an unwanted operation on it without the knowledge of the legitimate user. An attacker, who successfully makes an MSM user who has already established a session to MSM web interface clicks a forged link to the MSM web interface, e.g., link is sent per E-Mail, could perform harmful command on MSM through its web server interface. This issue affects: Hitachi Energy MSM V2.2 and prior versions.

MediumCVSS 5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Hitachi Energy MSM v2.2 and earlier has a CSRF flaw in its HTTP web interface. If a logged-in MSM user is tricked into clicking a forged link, the application may accept an unintended action as that user. The issue is not rated critical, but it matters where MSM is used for sensitive operational functions.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted operational-risk issue, not an internet-wide emergency based on the provided evidence. Prioritize if MSM supports critical environments or is reachable from broad user networks.

Technical view

The MSM web interface does not sufficiently verify that a valid request was intentionally submitted by the authenticated user. CVE data maps this to CWE-352 with CVSS 3.1 score 5.0: network attack vector, high complexity, no privileges required by the attacker, and required user interaction, with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Hitachi Energy MSM v2.2 or earlier, especially where the MSM HTTP web interface is reachable by users who browse email or external content while authenticated.

Exploitation context

The source describes a phishing-style CSRF scenario requiring an MSM user with an active web session to click a forged MSM link. The bundle does not show KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description and Hitachi Energy reference. The source names affected MSM v2.2 and prior versions but does not provide exploit code, confirmed exploitation, or specific remediation text in the supplied bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all Hitachi Energy MSM deployments and versions.
  • Check Hitachi Energy advisory guidance for supported updates or mitigations.
  • Restrict MSM web interface access to trusted administrative networks.
  • Train MSM users not to open unsolicited MSM links while logged in.
  • Review session timeout and logout practices for MSM administrators.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether MSM v2.2 or earlier is present.
  • Verify who can reach the MSM HTTP web interface.
  • Assess whether administrators browse email or web content during active MSM sessions.
  • Review vendor advisory details before applying operational changes.
  • Check logs for unexpected MSM actions tied to legitimate user sessions.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-40335 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L1.63.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-40335Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Hitachi EnergyMSMv2.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.