LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-40124: Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows with Network Access Manager Module Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Network Access Manager (NAM) module of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to escalate privileges on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to incorrect privilege assignment to scripts executed before user logon. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by configuring a script to be executed before logon. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges.

MediumCVSS 6.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue affects Windows systems using Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client with the Network Access Manager module. A local authenticated attacker who can configure a pre-logon script could cause code to run as SYSTEM, giving full control of that endpoint.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority endpoint hardening issue. It is not shown as actively exploited, but compromise can produce SYSTEM access on affected Windows devices.

Technical view

Cisco reports incorrect privilege assignment for scripts executed before user logon in the AnyConnect NAM module for Windows. Exploitation requires local access and high privileges, but successful exploitation permits arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM privileges. The provided sources do not identify specific affected or fixed versions.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Windows endpoints running Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client with the NAM module, especially where pre-logon scripts are configured or administratively changeable.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or any cited active exploitation. The attack is local, authenticated, and requires high privileges, reducing broad internet-scale risk but increasing post-compromise impact.

Researcher notes

Key uncertainty is version scope: the provided bundle lists the product but not affected or fixed versions. Validation should focus on Cisco advisory mapping, NAM presence, and whether pre-logon script configuration is reachable by local privileged users.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco advisory for affected and fixed AnyConnect NAM versions.
  • Inventory Windows endpoints with AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and NAM installed.
  • Prioritize updates or configuration changes according to Cisco guidance.
  • Restrict who can configure pre-logon scripts on managed endpoints.
  • Monitor privileged local changes to AnyConnect NAM configuration.

Validation and detection

  • Compare installed AnyConnect NAM versions against Cisco advisory guidance.
  • Confirm whether pre-logon script execution is enabled on managed Windows endpoints.
  • Review endpoint logs for unexpected SYSTEM-level execution tied to login workflows.
  • Check management tooling for unauthorized changes to NAM script settings.
  • Verify remediation status through endpoint inventory or software compliance reporting.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-266: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-40124 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.7CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H0.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.7Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-40124Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Clientn/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-266 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Privilege Assignment

Incorrect Privilege Assignment represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.