LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-39819: Adobe InCopy Memory Corruption Vulnerability Could Lead to Arbitrary Code Execution

Adobe InCopy version 11.1 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious XML file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This Adobe InCopy flaw can let an attacker run code if a user opens a malicious XML file. The impact is serious because the code runs with the user’s permissions, but exploitation requires user interaction and the source bundle does not show known active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority endpoint remediation item for teams using InCopy, not an internet-wide emergency. The main business risk is compromise through malicious files sent to users.

Technical view

CVE-2021-39819 is a CWE-788 memory corruption issue in Adobe InCopy 11.1 and earlier caused by insecure handling of malicious XML files. CVSS 3.1 is 7.8 with local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and required user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on endpoints where Adobe InCopy 11.1 or earlier is installed, especially publishing or content teams that receive XML or document assets from external sources.

Exploitation context

The attacker must convince a user to open a malicious XML file. The source bundle does not identify public exploit activity, and KEV status is false, so active exploitation is not evidenced here.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports arbitrary code execution via malicious XML parsing in InCopy 11.1 and earlier. No exploit details, patch version, or active exploitation evidence are included beyond the Adobe advisory reference and CVE metadata.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory endpoints for Adobe InCopy 11.1 and earlier.
  • Apply Adobe guidance from APSB21-71 for affected installations.
  • Limit opening XML files from untrusted or unexpected sources.
  • Prioritize remediation for users handling external publishing assets.
  • Use least-privilege accounts where InCopy is required.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed Adobe InCopy versions across managed endpoints.
  • Compare affected systems against Adobe APSB21-71 guidance.
  • Verify remediation through software inventory or endpoint management records.
  • Review workflows that accept XML files from outside parties.
  • Check security tooling for suspicious activity tied to document handling.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-788: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-39819 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-39819Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
AdobeInCopyunspecified, unspecified, unspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-788 · source CWE mapping

Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer

Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.