LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-39244: Authenticated Semi-Blind Command Injection (via Parameter Injection) exists on Altus Nexto, Nexto Xpress, a...

Authenticated Semi-Blind Command Injection (via Parameter Injection) exists on Altus Nexto, Nexto Xpress, and Hadron Xtorm devices via the getlogs.cgi tcpdump feature. This affects Nexto NX3003 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3004 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3005 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3010 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX3020 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX3030 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX5100 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX5101 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX5110 1.1.2.8, Nexto NX5210 1.1.2.8, Nexto Xpress XP300 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP315 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP325 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP340 1.8.11.0, and Hadron Xtorm HX3040 1.7.58.0.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-39244 is an authenticated command injection issue in Altus Nexto, Nexto Xpress, and Hadron Xtorm devices. A logged-in attacker could abuse the getlogs.cgi tcpdump feature to run unintended system commands. The source bundle does not provide CVSS scoring, a confirmed fix version, or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority operational technology exposure review, especially for environments using the named Altus devices. The immediate business task is to find affected assets, restrict access, and obtain vendor remediation guidance before assuming the issue is resolved.

Technical view

The vulnerability is described as authenticated semi-blind command injection via parameter injection in the getlogs.cgi tcpdump feature. Listed affected firmware includes multiple Nexto NX, Nexto Xpress XP, and Hadron Xtorm HX3040 versions. The CVE record has no CWE or CVSS data in the supplied bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where affected Altus devices are deployed with reachable authenticated web or management access. Risk is higher if device administration interfaces are accessible from broad internal networks, remote access paths, or weakly controlled accounts.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The issue requires authentication, which lowers opportunistic exposure but remains serious if credentials are shared, reused, phished, or held by compromised operators.

Researcher notes

Evidence is specific about affected products, versions, and the vulnerable feature, but incomplete on scoring, exploit status, and remediation. Avoid claiming exploitation in the wild. Validation should focus on asset/version confirmation, access path review, and vendor advisory tracking.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify affected Altus model and firmware versions in asset inventory.
  • Check Altus guidance for fixed firmware, workarounds, or support instructions.
  • Restrict device management access to trusted administration networks only.
  • Review and tighten accounts with access to device diagnostic features.
  • Monitor for unusual authenticated diagnostic or log collection activity.

Validation and detection

  • Compare deployed models and firmware against the CVE affected version list.
  • Confirm management interfaces are not exposed to the internet or broad networks.
  • Review access logs for unexpected authenticated use of diagnostic features.
  • Verify whether Altus has published applicable remediation for each device.
  • Document any compensating network controls around affected devices.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-39244 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.