Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
GLPI versions before 9.5.6 have CSRF protection that can be bypassed in many areas. A logged-in user context could be abused to make GLPI perform unauthorized actions, potentially affecting sensitive IT asset and service management data.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation for any GLPI instance below 9.5.6, especially if it supports IT operations or asset management. The vendor names no workaround other than upgrading.
Technical view
CVE-2021-39209 is a CWE-352 CSRF protection bypass in glpi-project GLPI before 9.5.6. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8, with network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges required, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to GLPI deployments running versions earlier than 9.5.6. Risk is higher where GLPI is broadly reachable and contains operationally sensitive inventory, ticketing, user, or asset-management data.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The advisory states a logged-in GLPI user can bypass CSRF protection in many places, but it does not provide endpoint-level detail.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sufficient for affected version range, severity, and fixed version. It is incomplete for exploitation in the wild, affected endpoints, and precise action classes. Avoid assuming more than a broad CSRF bypass across many GLPI locations.
Mitigation direction
- Upgrade GLPI to version 9.5.6 or later.
- Treat older GLPI instances as vulnerable until verified otherwise.
- Check official GLPI guidance if upgrade timing is constrained.
- Review privileged GLPI account activity after remediation.
Validation and detection
- Inventory GLPI instances and record their exact versions.
- Confirm all production and staging instances are at least 9.5.6.
- Review access paths to GLPI, including internet and VPN exposure.
- Check logs for unusual administrative or configuration changes.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2021-39209 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 8.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
8.8HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-5qpf-32w7-c56pCVE reference · x_refsource_CONFIRM
- https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/releases/tag/9.5.6CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
