LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-39151: XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack

XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose.

HighCVSS 8.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

XStream before 1.4.18 can be abused when an application processes attacker-controlled XML. A successful attack can lead to arbitrary code execution, meaning full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability for the affected application. Organizations using XStream safely with a strict type whitelist are specifically noted as not affected by this issue.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority dependency risk where XStream handles external XML. It can become application-level code execution, but evidence provided does not support emergency active-exploitation handling. Patch or isolate exposed parsing paths and require owners to prove whitelist-based hardening.

Technical view

The flaw affects x-stream XStream versions before 1.4.18 and is associated with unsafe deserialization and remote code loading behavior. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.5 with network attack vector, high complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, scope change, and high C/I/A impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Java applications or vendor products that include XStream and deserialize XML streams influenced by users, integrations, queues, or external services. Debian, Fedora, Oracle, and NetApp advisories indicate downstream packaging and product relevance, but the bundle does not enumerate every affected product.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. The advisory says a remote attacker may manipulate the processed input stream to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host, but attack complexity is rated high and low privileges are required.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on deserialization boundaries, XStream security configuration, and bundled dependency discovery. The key control is a narrow type whitelist; XStream 1.4.18 changed the default away from blacklist-based security because general-purpose blacklist protection was not considered securable.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade XStream to 1.4.18 or a vendor-supported fixed package.
  • Configure XStream's security framework with a minimal required type whitelist.
  • Check Debian, Fedora, Oracle, and NetApp guidance for packaged or bundled exposure.
  • Prioritize systems parsing externally influenced XML before internal-only batch jobs.
  • Remove unused XML deserialization paths where XStream is no longer required.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory direct and transitive dependencies for XStream versions before 1.4.18.
  • Review application code for XStream processing of untrusted or semi-trusted XML.
  • Confirm a restrictive allowlist is configured for required application types only.
  • Verify distribution packages match Debian or Fedora fixed advisory versions.
  • Check affected vendor products against Oracle and NetApp advisories.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
10

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-434: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-502: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-39151 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
12Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.86Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-39151Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
x-streamxstream< 1.4.18Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-434 · source CWE mapping

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-502 · source CWE mapping

Deserialization of Untrusted Data

Deserialization of Untrusted Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.