LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-38685: Command Injection Vulnerability in VioStor

A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP device, VioStor. If exploited, this vulnerability allows remote attackers to run arbitrary commands. We have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions of QVR: QVR FW 5.1.6 build 20211109 and later

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-38685 is a critical QNAP VioStor/QVR command injection flaw. A remote attacker could run arbitrary commands without authentication or user interaction if a vulnerable device is reachable. QNAP says the issue is fixed in QVR FW 5.1.6 build 20211109 and later.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent for any deployed QNAP VioStor/QVR systems. Remote unauthenticated command execution can support device takeover and operational disruption. Prioritize identifying exposed devices and confirming the vendor-fixed firmware level.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-78 command injection in QNAP VioStor/QVR. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Affected versions are not specified in the provided sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where QNAP VioStor/QVR devices run vulnerable QVR firmware and are reachable over a network, especially from untrusted networks. The source bundle does not define exact affected version ranges beyond the fixed QVR release.

Exploitation context

The provided data does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The risk is still serious because the scoring indicates unauthenticated, remote command execution with full impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Researcher notes

Key gaps are affected version specificity and exploit-status evidence. The strongest source-grounded facts are QNAP’s advisory, CWE-78 classification, CVSS 9.8 vector, and the fixed QVR firmware version. Avoid assuming broader QNAP product impact without additional vendor evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade QVR firmware to 5.1.6 build 20211109 or later.
  • Check QNAP advisory QSA-21-51 for current vendor guidance.
  • Restrict QNAP VioStor/QVR access from untrusted networks.
  • Prioritize any internet-reachable devices before lower-exposure systems.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory QNAP VioStor/QVR systems in the environment.
  • Record installed QVR firmware versions for each device.
  • Confirm QVR firmware is 5.1.6 build 20211109 or later.
  • Verify whether management interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review monitoring for unexpected command execution or device behavior.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-38685 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-38685Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QNAP Systems Inc.QVRunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.