LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-37633: XSS via d-popover and d-html-popover attribute

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. In versions prior to 2.7.8 rendering of d-popover tooltips can be susceptible to XSS attacks. This vulnerability only affects sites which have modified or disabled Discourse's default Content Security Policy. This issue is patched in the latest `stable` 2.7.8 version of Discourse. As a workaround users may ensure that the Content Security Policy is enabled, and has not been modified in a way which would make it more vulnerable to XSS attacks.

HighCVSS 7.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-37633 is a cross-site scripting issue in Discourse before 2.7.8. It matters most for sites that weakened or disabled Discourse’s default Content Security Policy. A successful attack could expose sensitive browser-accessible information after user interaction, but the provided sources do not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority hygiene fix for internet-facing Discourse sites, especially where CSP has been customized. Upgrade and CSP review are straightforward risk reducers; emergency response is not supported by the provided evidence.

Technical view

Discourse versions before stable 2.7.8 rendered d-popover and d-html-popover tooltip attributes in a way susceptible to XSS. The CVSS vector indicates network reachability, low attack complexity, no privileges required, required user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality impact. The vendor says exposure depends on modified or disabled CSP.

Likely exposure

Public Discourse forums running versions before 2.7.8 are the affected population, but practical exposure is narrower: the advisory says the issue only affects sites with Discourse’s default CSP modified or disabled.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not identify active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation is described as XSS requiring user interaction and a CSP posture weaker than Discourse’s default.

Researcher notes

Do not assume all Discourse deployments are exploitable. The key exposure discriminator is CSP modification or disablement. Focus validation on affected version, CSP posture, and any local customization that changes tooltip rendering or browser script controls.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Discourse to stable 2.7.8 or later.
  • Ensure Discourse Content Security Policy is enabled.
  • Review CSP changes that weaken script execution protections.
  • Check the vendor advisory before applying compensating controls.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Discourse instances and confirm version is 2.7.8 or later.
  • Review site settings or configuration for CSP modifications.
  • Verify CSP is enabled and aligned with Discourse defaults.
  • Prioritize public forums and instances with custom themes or plugins.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-37633 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.4CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N2.84Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.4High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-37633Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
discoursediscourse< 2.7.8Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.