LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-3742: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in chatwoot/chatwoot

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in chatwoot/chatwoot, affecting all versions prior to 2.5.0. The vulnerability allows an attacker to upload an SVG file containing a malicious SSRF payload. When the SVG file is used as an avatar and opened in a new tab, it can trigger the SSRF, potentially leading to host redirection.

HighCVSS 7.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Chatwoot versions before 2.5.0 could let a highly privileged attacker abuse an SVG avatar to make the server request attacker-chosen resources when that avatar is opened. This is not listed as known exploited, but the potential impact is high because SSRF can affect internal systems or sensitive services.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority patching item for Chatwoot, especially where the service can access internal systems. The privilege and interaction requirements reduce urgency versus unauthenticated remote bugs, but SSRF impact can be material in connected environments.

Technical view

CVE-2021-3742 is an SSRF flaw in chatwoot/chatwoot before 2.5.0. The reported path involves uploading an SVG containing SSRF behavior, setting it as an avatar, and requiring user interaction by opening it in a new tab. CVSS 3.0 is 7.9 with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations running chatwoot/chatwoot before 2.5.0 are the relevant exposure group. Risk is higher where privileged users can upload avatar images and where the Chatwoot server can reach internal networks, metadata services, or sensitive downstream systems.

Exploitation context

The CVE record does not indicate CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The attack requires high privileges and user interaction, but low complexity once those conditions exist. Evidence provided supports SSRF via SVG avatar handling, with potential host redirection.

Researcher notes

Do not assume broader product impact beyond chatwoot/chatwoot from the supplied evidence. The public description identifies versions before 2.5.0 and references a GitHub fix commit, but detailed environmental prerequisites and complete exploit telemetry are not provided here.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Chatwoot deployments to version 2.5.0 or later.
  • Review Chatwoot vendor guidance and the referenced fixing commit before choosing compensating controls.
  • Prioritize internet-facing or network-connected Chatwoot instances for remediation.
  • Restrict avatar upload workflows to trusted administrators until patched, where operationally feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Chatwoot deployments and record their running versions.
  • Flag any chatwoot/chatwoot version earlier than 2.5.0 as affected.
  • Confirm whether avatar upload workflows accept SVG files in affected environments.
  • Review logs for unusual SVG avatar uploads or suspicious server-side redirection activity.
  • After upgrading, verify the deployment reports version 2.5.0 or later.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-3742 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.9 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.9CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.26Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

7.9High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2021-3742Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
chatwootchatwoot/chatwootunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.