LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-36184: A improper neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Fortinet FortiWLM...

A improper neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Fortinet FortiWLM version 8.6.1 and below allows attacker to disclosure device, users and database information via crafted HTTP requests.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a high-severity SQL injection issue in Fortinet FortiWLM. A low-privileged attacker with network access could send crafted HTTP requests and expose device, user, and database information. The provided CVSS vector also indicates potential integrity and availability impact.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation where FortiWLM manages production wireless infrastructure or is reachable from broad internal networks. The issue can expose sensitive operational data and may affect system integrity or availability.

Technical view

CVE-2021-36184 affects Fortinet FortiWLM versions 8.6.1 and below in the listed affected branch set. It is improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands via HTTP requests, rated CVSS 3.1 8.8, with network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, and no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running affected FortiWLM versions, especially where the web management surface is reachable by authenticated low-privilege users over the network.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. CVSS marks exploit code maturity as proof-of-concept, but no exploit details are provided here.

Researcher notes

Do not assume unauthenticated exploitation: the CVSS vector requires low privileges. The bundle names SQL injection through crafted HTTP requests but does not provide endpoint details, fixed-version text, or confirmed exploitation evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory all FortiWLM instances and record exact versions.
  • Compare deployments against Fortinet’s affected version list.
  • Review Fortinet FG-IR-21-107 for vendor-approved fixed versions or mitigations.
  • Restrict FortiWLM management access to trusted administrative networks.
  • Review logs for unusual authenticated HTTP activity against FortiWLM.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether FortiWLM is deployed in the environment.
  • Verify each instance version against the affected versions in the source bundle.
  • Check whether management interfaces are network-reachable beyond trusted administrators.
  • Review access logs for unexpected low-privilege authenticated activity.
  • Track remediation evidence against Fortinet advisory FG-IR-21-107.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-36184 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:C2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-36184Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortinet FortiWLMFortiWLM 8.6.1, 8.6.0, 8.5.2, 8.5.1, 8.5.0, 8.4.2, 8.4.1, 8.4.0, 8.3.2, 8.3.1, 8.3.0, 8.2.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.