LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-36174: A memory allocation with excessive size value vulnerability in the license verification function of FortiPo...

A memory allocation with excessive size value vulnerability in the license verification function of FortiPortal before 6.0.6 may allow an attacker to perform a denial of service attack via specially crafted license blobs.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-36174 is a denial-of-service issue in Fortinet FortiPortal before 6.0.6. A specially crafted license blob can trigger excessive memory allocation during license verification, potentially degrading or interrupting service. The sources do not indicate data theft, privilege escalation, or confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Schedule remediation in the normal vulnerability cycle, faster for externally reachable or business-critical FortiPortal deployments. This is not a known exploited or data-loss issue from the provided evidence, but downtime in a security management portal can still disrupt operations.

Technical view

The flaw is in FortiPortal license verification before 6.0.6. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L, meaning network-reachable, low-complexity triggering with no privileges, but user interaction is required and impact is limited to availability.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Fortinet FortiPortal versions before 6.0.6. Risk is highest where license handling workflows are reachable or routinely used by administrators. The bundle does not identify other Fortinet products as affected.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The CVSS vector includes proof-of-concept exploit maturity, so vulnerability managers should treat exploitation as plausible but not evidenced as active from this bundle.

Researcher notes

Validation should focus on version confirmation, access paths to license verification, and service availability telemetry. Do not assume broader Fortinet exposure: the bundle names only FortiPortal before 6.0.6. User interaction is required per CVSS, which affects exploitability assessment.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade FortiPortal to version 6.0.6 or later.
  • Review Fortinet advisory FG-IR-21-109 for vendor-specific guidance.
  • Restrict FortiPortal administrative and license-management access to trusted networks.
  • Monitor FortiPortal availability and memory-related failures until remediated.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory FortiPortal instances and record exact running versions.
  • Confirm no FortiPortal deployment is earlier than 6.0.6.
  • Check whether license-management workflows are exposed beyond trusted administrators.
  • Review logs for unexplained FortiPortal restarts, memory exhaustion, or service degradation.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-36174 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:P/RL:U/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:P/RL:U/RC:C2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-36174Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:P/RL:U/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortinet FortiPortalFortiPortal before 6.0.6Listed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.