LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-34791: Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software and Firepower Threat Defense Software Application Level Gateway Bypass Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in the Application Level Gateway (ALG) for the Network Address Translation (NAT) feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the ALG and open unauthorized connections with a host located behind the ALG. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: These vulnerabilities have been publicly discussed as NAT Slipstreaming.

MediumCVSS 4.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can let an outside attacker bypass Cisco firewall NAT inspection logic and cause unauthorized connections to an internal host. The source describes user interaction as required and impact as limited integrity only, so urgency is moderate unless exposed ASA or FTD systems protect sensitive internal services.

Executive priority

Treat as a planned remediation item, not an emergency, unless exposed firewalls protect sensitive internal hosts or browser-driven traffic paths are high risk.

Technical view

CVE-2021-34791 affects Cisco ASA and FTD Application Level Gateway behavior for NAT. Cisco describes multiple ALG bypass issues publicly discussed as NAT Slipstreaming. CVSS 3.1 is 4.7: network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, changed scope, low integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations using Cisco ASA or FTD with NAT ALG functionality may be exposed. The provided affected product list explicitly names Cisco ASA Software; the CVE description and Cisco advisory title also reference FTD.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. It does state the issue was publicly discussed as NAT Slipstreaming. CVSS indicates exploitation requires user interaction, reducing likelihood for unattended compromise.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE bundle and Cisco advisory reference. Do not infer exploit availability, broader products, or specific fixes beyond Cisco’s published guidance. The weakness is categorized as CWE-358.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Cisco advisory for affected releases, fixed releases, and workarounds.
  • Prioritize updates for internet-facing ASA or FTD deployments using NAT ALG.
  • Reduce unnecessary ALG/NAT inspection exposure where Cisco guidance permits.
  • Monitor Cisco security updates for revised remediation guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco ASA and FTD devices performing NAT ALG functions.
  • Map device software versions against the Cisco advisory.
  • Confirm whether affected features are enabled on exposed firewall paths.
  • Review vulnerability scanner findings against Cisco’s official advisory scope.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-358: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-34791 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.7CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.7Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-34791Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-358 · source CWE mapping

Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard

Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.