LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-34790: Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software and Firepower Threat Defense Software Application Level Gateway Bypass Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in the Application Level Gateway (ALG) for the Network Address Translation (NAT) feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the ALG and open unauthorized connections with a host located behind the ALG. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: These vulnerabilities have been publicly discussed as NAT Slipstreaming.

MediumCVSS 4.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This Cisco issue can let a remote, unauthenticated attacker bypass NAT Application Level Gateway handling and open unauthorized connections to a host behind the gateway. It is associated with publicly discussed NAT Slipstreaming behavior. The business risk is moderate because user interaction is required and the CVSS impact is limited to low integrity impact.

Executive priority

Treat as a scheduled security maintenance item, not an emergency, unless critical internal systems depend on exposed NAT ALG behavior. Prioritize confirmation of affected Cisco versions and apply vendor guidance during the next appropriate maintenance window.

Technical view

CVE-2021-34790 covers multiple Cisco ASA and FTD NAT ALG bypass vulnerabilities. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N, score 4.7. The source bundle lists ASA affected with versions unspecified, while the description and Cisco advisory title include FTD.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where Cisco ASA or FTD systems provide NAT ALG handling for traffic to protected internal hosts. Exact affected versions are not included in the source bundle, so teams must confirm release exposure through Cisco guidance.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided data. The sources describe public discussion as NAT Slipstreaming, but they do not state active exploitation. User interaction is required according to the CVSS vector.

Researcher notes

The public bundle does not provide affected version ranges, fixed releases, or Cisco workaround details. Analysis should stay anchored to Cisco’s advisory and the CVSS requirement for user interaction. Do not infer exploitation from NAT Slipstreaming discussion alone.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Cisco ASA and FTD deployments using NAT ALG functionality.
  • Confirm affected and fixed releases in Cisco’s advisory before changes.
  • Apply Cisco-recommended updates or mitigations where applicable.
  • Prioritize internet-edge gateways protecting sensitive internal hosts.

Validation and detection

  • Compare deployed ASA and FTD versions against Cisco’s advisory.
  • Identify NAT ALG usage on affected gateway paths.
  • Review logs for unexpected connections to hosts behind ALG protections.
  • After remediation, verify gateway policy still blocks unauthorized inbound connections.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-358: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-34790 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.7CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.7Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-34790Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-358 · source CWE mapping

Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard

Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.