LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-34777: Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches Link Layer Discovery Protocol Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE affects Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches through flaws in LLDP, a local network discovery protocol. A nearby attacker on the same Layer 2 network could disrupt the switch, corrupt LLDP data, or potentially execute code. This is not described as remotely exploitable from the internet.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate infrastructure maintenance risk. It is constrained to local network adjacency, but affected switches can underpin business connectivity. Patch during the next controlled network maintenance window, sooner where untrusted devices share the same LAN.

Technical view

Cisco reports multiple LLDP implementation vulnerabilities in Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. The CVE is CWE-120 with CVSS 3.1 score 4.3, adjacent attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. Cisco says firmware updates address the vulnerabilities.

Likely exposure

Exposure is mainly internal or local-network facing: an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected switch. Risk is higher on shared, guest, unmanaged, or physically accessible LAN segments using affected Cisco small-business switches.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not cite active exploitation, and CISA KEV status is false. Exploitation requires Layer 2 adjacency, limiting reach, but unauthenticated access on the same broadcast domain is enough according to Cisco’s description.

Researcher notes

The source bundle has a naming inconsistency: the title and description cite Small Business 220 Series, while the affected field names 200 Series. Use Cisco’s advisory as the authoritative source for exact device and firmware applicability.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Cisco guidance for exact affected models and fixed firmware.
  • Apply Cisco firmware updates that address these LLDP vulnerabilities.
  • Prioritize switches on shared, guest, or physically accessible LANs.
  • Restrict untrusted devices from affected Layer 2 broadcast domains.
  • Review whether LLDP exposure is necessary on untrusted edge ports.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches.
  • Compare installed firmware against Cisco’s advisory and fixed releases.
  • Map affected switches to broadcast domains with untrusted access.
  • Check for unexpected reloads or LLDP database anomalies.
  • Document remediation status and remaining exposed segments.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-34777 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-34777Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Small Business 200 Series Smart Switchesn/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.