LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-34755: Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software Command Injection Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in the CLI of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

MediumCVSS 6.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco FTD had multiple CLI command injection flaws that could let a highly privileged local user run commands as root. This is not a typical internet-facing bug, but it matters where firewall admin accounts are shared, overprivileged, or compromised.

Executive priority

Treat this as a priority for firewall administration hygiene and patch verification, not as an emergency internet-wide exposure. Confirm affected FTD assets, validate upgrade status, and tighten privileged access controls.

Technical view

CVE-2021-34755 covers multiple Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software CLI command injection vulnerabilities tied to improper input validation. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, meaning exploitation requires local access and high privileges but can fully affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Cisco Firepower Threat Defense deployments where an attacker already has local authenticated CLI access with high privileges. The supplied bundle does not enumerate affected or fixed versions.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Practical risk rises if administrator credentials are compromised, shared, weakly monitored, or available through jump hosts and management networks.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports local authenticated command injection with root-level impact, but version granularity and fixed-release details are not present in the supplied bundle. Avoid assuming remote exploitability or active exploitation without additional sourced evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for affected and fixed FTD releases.
  • Upgrade or patch according to Cisco's published guidance.
  • Restrict CLI access to trusted administrators only.
  • Enforce least privilege and named administrator accounts.
  • Monitor privileged CLI activity on FTD devices.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Cisco Firepower Threat Defense appliances and virtual deployments.
  • Compare installed FTD versions against Cisco's advisory.
  • Review who has local or CLI administrative access.
  • Check recent privileged CLI activity for unusual administrative behavior.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-34755 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.7CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H0.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.7Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-34755Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Firepower Threat Defense Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.